<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3:10 TO YUMA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://contour-at-the-movies.com/2007/11/26/310-to-yuma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://contour-at-the-movies.com/2007/11/26/310-to-yuma/</link>
	<description>What we're watching and how it measures up in Contour</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 03:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim McPike</title>
		<link>http://contour-at-the-movies.com/2007/11/26/310-to-yuma/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim McPike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 21:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totallywrite.wordpress.com/2007/11/26/310-to-yuma/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>The original 3:10 had an even happier ending. Dan (Van Hefflin) doesn&#039;t get killed in the end and ALMOST kisses Ben (Glenn Ford).

I think the secret to making the ending more believable (in both versions) would have been a clearer motivation for Ben&#039;s decision in the end to help Dan. Ben&#039;s arc is a little better motivated in the new 3:10, but is cleaner, in a sense, in the 50&#039;s version because the action is minimized. The original is a psychological thriller, the new version an action thriller.

I&#039;d be interested in your analysis of the original.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original 3:10 had an even happier ending. Dan (Van Hefflin) doesn&#8217;t get killed in the end and ALMOST kisses Ben (Glenn Ford).</p>
<p>I think the secret to making the ending more believable (in both versions) would have been a clearer motivation for Ben&#8217;s decision in the end to help Dan. Ben&#8217;s arc is a little better motivated in the new 3:10, but is cleaner, in a sense, in the 50&#8242;s version because the action is minimized. The original is a psychological thriller, the new version an action thriller.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested in your analysis of the original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Orban</title>
		<link>http://contour-at-the-movies.com/2007/11/26/310-to-yuma/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>John Orban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totallywrite.wordpress.com/2007/11/26/310-to-yuma/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>First off, I have to admit I&#039;m a sucker for cowboy movies...have loved them since I was a kid and used to listen to The Lone Ranger on the radio.

I really liked this movie because, as much as anything, I could see the plot structure very clearly. I could see the end of Act I, the BIG QUESTION, and the YES/NO conflict in the Act II, etc.

You&#039;re right...the ending left a bit to be desired...almost like they were going for a &quot;You&#039;ve Got Mail&quot; kind of teary-eyed ending...I was waiting for Ben to kiss Dan goodbye...oh wait, that&#039;s Brokeback Mountain?

I guess I have to see the original movie to find out what the writers were trying to achieve with this version...obviously something different?

As I think about it, I really like the way they handled the character of the son. Well...I&#039;ll be searching discountdvd.com for a copy of the original.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, I have to admit I&#8217;m a sucker for cowboy movies&#8230;have loved them since I was a kid and used to listen to The Lone Ranger on the radio.</p>
<p>I really liked this movie because, as much as anything, I could see the plot structure very clearly. I could see the end of Act I, the BIG QUESTION, and the YES/NO conflict in the Act II, etc.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right&#8230;the ending left a bit to be desired&#8230;almost like they were going for a &#8220;You&#8217;ve Got Mail&#8221; kind of teary-eyed ending&#8230;I was waiting for Ben to kiss Dan goodbye&#8230;oh wait, that&#8217;s Brokeback Mountain?</p>
<p>I guess I have to see the original movie to find out what the writers were trying to achieve with this version&#8230;obviously something different?</p>
<p>As I think about it, I really like the way they handled the character of the son. Well&#8230;I&#8217;ll be searching discountdvd.com for a copy of the original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

